<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>'Butterfly Effect, The'</title>
		<description>Discuss 'Butterfly Effect, The'</description>
		<link>http://www.critical-film.com/home/item/20-butterfly-effect.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:11:57 --700</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.critical-film.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jason Pitt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.critical-film.com/home/item/20-butterfly-effect.html#comment-22</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Lisa, firstly, the theory of the "Butterfly Effect" was in fact established by an MIT professor named Edward Lorenz in 1972, however it serves only to promote the idea of vast and unexpected occurences developing from small and seemingly unimportant events in a larger more dynamic system, such as our environment or atmosphere. However, obviously, as it is not a feasible scientific study, time-travel was in no way a part of his studies. And as such, the simple theory behind the film is similar to Lorenz's theory, yet can not be viewed as the basis of the film. Lorenz's academic paper was written in 1972, yet Ray Bradbury's fictional story was written in 1952, and is infinitely more close to the material than Lorenz's published theory. I would appreciate the next time you decide to throw in your two cents, you do YOUR research, before you criticize our reviews. We understand our place and the importance behind constructing a well-informed review. And I am of the opinion that cutting down someone else's work, when you haven't a single clue what you're talking about, nor can properly spell the words needed to get your attempt at a point across, is far more pretentious than giving an informed opinion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jason Pitt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:01:05 --700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.critical-film.com/home/item/20-butterfly-effect.html#comment-22</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>lisa says:</title>
			<link>http://www.critical-film.com/home/item/20-butterfly-effect.html#comment-21</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i would have thought that an attepmt to trash this movie would have inspired the writer to at least research the stems of the tittle itself. but no. i forgot im dealing with pretentious idiots. the tittle of the butterfly effect in fact, comes from an MIT preffesor , who sugested that the simple flap of a buttterflies wing could... so on and so forth. not from a story. idiot, the story simply used the butterfly to illustrate the point that this was the result of a "butterfly effect" set off a million years ago.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:59:22 --700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.critical-film.com/home/item/20-butterfly-effect.html#comment-21</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

