<p>The Brothers Grimm </p>
<p>A film review by Scott Wood </p>
<p>For Critical-film.com </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It was a fear of mine, for quite some time, that Terry Gilliam would never get another chance to direct. While his early work “Time Bandits” was praised for its wonderful visuals on modest money, every film he made after that (most notably “The Adventures of Baron Munchausen”) was slammed by going into serious overtime and as a consequence, vastly over budget. His work before “The Brothers Grimm,” “The Man Who Killed Don Quixote,” was a cinematic nightmare of a failure, and was never finished. When a studio invests so much money into an experimental director's work like that, only to have it all go down the drain, it can often mean the end of that director's career. Gilliam would have to find someone else willing to take the potentially huge financial risk in order to work again. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As it turns out, someone went out to find Gilliam, and not the other way around. “The Brothers Grimm” was not a Gilliam original, and he was not called on to the set until after the first director left. This series of events, while potentially great (we get to see another Gilliam film) were also potentially disastrous, for Gilliam (other than “12 Monkeys”, I believe) had only ever worked on his own material before, and I feared going in, a sense of detachment from this story. With some directors, like Wayne Wang, this would not be a big deal, but TG's style is such that he must be passionate about his movie in order for it turn out right; hence the going over-budget in the name of perfection. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>My fear did not come true, however, as Gilliam took a completely different route than I had expected. Instead of feeling a distance from the material, I believe he wanted to put as much of himself as he could into the picture; make it as much of as a “Terry Gilliam” film as possible. It's as though the creativity was building in him during the years of inactivity, and “The Brothers Grimm” was like an orgasmic release of the inspired insanity that fans of his work have missed all of this time. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>What really hurts is that the movie just doesn't work. It's a terrible script with annoying characters, and a meandering plot that doesn't make sense. While being good material for Gilliam to work on in the sense of its fantasy elements, no one, not even him, could make a good picture out of it. It is overlong, and all over the place and the comedy is extremely hit-and-miss. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I say this, but I honestly really did enjoy “The Brothers Grimm.” Even though it doesn't work, there are moments of amazing visual creativity that I loved, and some crazy violence that I wasn't expecting. The fact that Terry Gilliam really tried his best with a movie that I assume he knew wasn't great, is something that I will not hesitate to appreciate. He really just wanted to entertain his audience in a way only he can. I can only hope that he gets another chance with material that is his own. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>(Three Stars) </p>
<p> </p>
<p class="style1">This review was provided in HTML format, as your browser is not capable of displaying flash content. To experience Critical-Film.com the way it was meant to be seen, please download the flash player from <a href="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&promoid=BIOW">Macromedia</a>.</p>
