Date Night - Online Premier, Monday December 5th!

386 Films "Date Night" will be available for online viewing through Vimeo on December 5th. Click the image above to watch the film (Again... Available December 5th), or click here to read Critical-Film's review of this incredible short.


Thursday, 01 July 2010 13:00

'Battle of the Bone'

Written by  Scott Wood

"Battle of the Bone""Battle of the Bone"4 1/2 stars

I was moderately aware of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland before "Battle of the Bone", not necessarily in detail, but I did have a meager understanding of the Protestant vs. Roman Catholic kerfuffle, and that it had been going for quite some time. I later learned that “The Troubles” was a proper name, and that it was an issue that regardless of being somewhat resolved, is still a forefront part of Northern Ireland's social and political culture. Which makes sense when one considers that the crux of “The Troubles'” violence occurred in the mid-1970's, and that many of the people involved in the military conflict would still be alive today.

I could go on to tell you of all I've learned about this “Troubles” stuff since seeing this movie, but that would be pointless, because even after everything I've read, it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. If you're Roman Catholic, you (violently) want Northern Ireland to be a separate country and you are (violently) opposed to Protestants, who are more passive-aggressive and cool with the idea of British rule. It is positively absurd sounding to me. Religion alone seems ludicrous; let alone tying it to feelings of contentious… I don't know. Pride, is it? I don't even know. Absurd.

But I'd be arrogant to believe that what I thought about this subject really mattered. It's not my country and it's not my culture, so my opinion on it is ignorant and invalid. I can take solace though with the fact that a film like "Battle of the Bone" shares my view, despite its director (first-timer George Clarke) being there to experience the “Troubles” firsthand. It is partly this grounding (the frustration and how he deals with it, not the ideology) that helps make his film so successful.

Zombies are often used metaphorically in cinema to represent sociological problems or looming threats. BOTB employs a zombie metaphor that is intentionally vague. It could refer to consumerism, racial intolerance, socialism, etc. Anything. It doesn't matter. What matters is that there are THINGS that are more important to the most recent generation of the Northern Irish, than arbitrary conflict that started long before they were born. “The Troubles” should no longer be relevant.

But like all great kung-fu/zombie films (what?), "Battle of the Bone" works completely at face value, never relying on its ideology as a crutch. Whether or not you can connect with the undertones of Northern Irish social satire is irrelevant. It is a relentlessly kinetic and joyous picture; always running and usually running away, each character perpetually fighting for his/her life. This is a first effort for most everyone involved, so it is not as much about skill of the martial arts (or the choreography or the editing), as it is about the passion of filmmaking.

This is a film made by and starring people who obviously love what they are doing, and are having fun doing it. This love is so impossibly infectious that I felt while watching “BOTB,” that I had no other choice but to reflect it right back to the screen. Clark knows his kung-fu and being a connoisseur, he knows what it takes to be entertained by the genre. Excitement comes through in every frame and rampant spontaneity drives the film forward. From the stunts, to the violence, to a little scene where two friends play piano and sing a song in a conference room in a nuthouse, while unbeknownst to them zombies are ravaging the building. I wish I could describe every cute little touch and tangible threat, but we'd be here all day and nobody would want that. It manages to be wall-to-wall action without being boring for one moment, and somehow among the mayhem maintains an innocence and undeniable charm. I absolutely adored this movie.

There are people who like to protest when I am offended by certain films that obviously only exist to make money. I got hate mail from people for my negative reviews of "Babel" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall", and I listened people who thought that I was unfair to "Swimfan". While it may be true that these pictures may be more technically sound than “BOTB,” I am offended by their lemming quality, their laziness, and their intention (respectively) and I refuse to applaud them. If Hollywood films consistently had even a third of the passion displayed in "Battle of the Bone", I'd have nothing to bitch about.

Rate this film
(5 votes)
Scott Wood

Scott Wood

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
0 #10 Drivel.Arms Of Vishnu 2011-06-08 08:39
Low budget review for a low budget film.

Title says it all.
Quote
 
 
+1 #9 RE: 'Battle of the Bone'Gordon Greene 2010-12-14 16:22
I saw this movie quite recently and I cn honestly say it was a truly terrible experience. The script was so bad it was almost non-existent, and I am genuinely stunned anyone could even attempt to defend it. I would love to see a small independent Ulster film maker create something worthwhile, but BOTB was a pile of steaming manure. I hope the follow up movies are a massive improvement, although even that would only propel the creation into the realms of crap rather than dirge. Watch it and understand, this is a unique and pretty awful experience.
Quote
 
 
0 #8 ShiteJim 2010-11-09 06:13
This film sucks :lol:
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 Maybe not for EveryoneJason Pitt 2010-07-04 17:29
Perhaps "Battle of the Bone" is not for everyone's tastes, but claiming George Clarke is a molester of cinema may be a little intense.

George Clarke represents the small percentage of us who has actually achieved what so many of us have set out to do. He's made a film (multiple films, actually) and has succeeded in doing so, through sheer determination and drive, regardless of obstacles. He has succeeded where so many have failed, and should be commended for this feat alone.
Quote
 
 
0 #6 Anonymous2 2010-07-01 13:47
Quoting Anonymous:
Battle of the Bone is a horrible film representing the arrogance that George Clarke has for film making within the film industry. The script has far too many plot holes excused by Clarke claiming "we only had ten grand" and far too many mistakes to ever be taken seriously by any decent film producing company.

The people within the film also represent the easily impressed and manipulated who have been "brain washed" by Clarke for his own ends. Allowing them to think that they are above their stations. With no expertise and no genuine credibility, this film should have been stopped before production began. Clarke's prologue about The Troubles tells an unusual version of events that in no way relates to the film or Belfast.

Shane Todd (The Lead) is a wooden actor with no visible talent, and the film overall turns now and again into "The Shane Todd Show" - something I believe wouldn't get past an idea phase. Alan Crawford represents the "have a go actor" generation within the acting community and sells brilliantly as someone without talent.

With no one to question what Clarke was doing, he only ever stroked his ego and his balls. Which Clarke seems to do a lot of.

Clarke is to film making, what peadophiles are to kids.

lol - Nice!! Someone needs to get off their ass and do something with themselves instead off spitting shite like this out because of the big green eyed monster... Get a life Mr Anonymous
Quote
 
 
0 #5 Anonymous 2010-07-01 13:41
Battle of the Bone is a horrible film representing the arrogance that George Clarke has for film making within the film industry. The script has far too many plot holes excused by Clarke claiming "we only had ten grand" and far too many mistakes to ever be taken seriously by any decent film producing company.

The people within the film also represent the easily impressed and manipulated who have been "brain washed" by Clarke for his own ends. Allowing them to think that they are above their stations. With no expertise and no genuine credibility, this film should have been stopped before production began. Clarke's prologue about The Troubles tells an unusual version of events that in no way relates to the film or Belfast.

Shane Todd (The Lead) is a wooden actor with no visible talent, and the film overall turns now and again into "The Shane Todd Show" - something I believe wouldn't get past an idea phase. Alan Crawford represents the "have a go actor" generation within the acting community and sells brilliantly as someone without talent.

With no one to question what Clarke was doing, he only ever stroked his ego and his balls. Which Clarke seems to do a lot of.

Clarke is to film making, what peadophiles are to kids.
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Scott Wood 2010-07-01 13:21
Quoting John Rinehart:
I must disagree. Having passion doesn't make up for a terrible script. This film was the biggest waste of money I've ever spent. Avoid.

Actually, having passion CAN make up for a terrible script (which is something that can NOT be attributed to "BOTB"), just as lack of passion or a disconnect with the source material can destroy a good one.

You didn't feel what was happening on screen, and that's fair. Instead of telling us off, however... What is your reasoning? Simply offering that the film was "terrible" is hardly valid commentary.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Jason Pitt 2010-07-01 13:19
Quoting John Rinehart:
I must disagree. Having passion doesn't make up for a terrible script. This film was the biggest waste of money I've ever spent. Avoid.

I'm sorry you feel that way about "Battle of the Bone", John...

Personally I agree with Scott's comments, and found the film infectiously enjoyable. While I agree with you that the script won't be taking home any Irish Oscars, it served it's very simple purpose well. I think you may have had some slightly misled anticipations.

I can appreciate a good script as much as the next guy, however, from time to time, I'd rather see something that I can just sit down and enjoy, without thinking about it too much. "Battle of the Bone" is such a film. I'm sorry you were expecting the 'Citizen Kane' of Kung-Fu Zombie Movies, but if you can't appreciate a film like "Battle of the Bone" for what it is, you're missing out on a whole 'nother level of film enjoyment.

"Battle of the Bone" was entirely successful in achieving exactly what it set out to achieve, and in case you missed it... If you ever see a picture of the film's director, George Clarke, holding a little hand statue with an eye in the center of it... That's the "Audience Choice" award from this year's Freakshow Film Festival. So, in the eyes of the viewing public, they must be doing something right, don't you think?
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 John Rinehart 2010-07-01 13:15
I must disagree. Having passion doesn't make up for a terrible script. This film was the biggest waste of money I've ever spent. Avoid.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 George Clarke 2010-07-01 13:14
Hey Scott, just wanted to say a huge thank you for such an amazing review. It also helps me see what I intially set out to do when the film is seen and discussed by fresh faces outside of NI. I only hope I can keep the same thing going with everything else we make! Spread the fever! Talk soon buddy!!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh